NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment

NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment

NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment

Discussion: Political, Social, and Sociocultural Influences on Women’s Health

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment
From $10/Page
Order Essay

As an advanced practice nurse, you must remain current on health issues that commonly impact women such as birth control, abortion, family planning, the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Many of these women’s health issues are heavily influenced by political, social, and sociocultural factors. These influences might not only affect a woman’s ability or desire to receive care, but also a provider’s ability or willingness to offer care. How might political, social, and sociocultural factors influence your personal perceptions of these women’s health issues? NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment

Permalink: 

To prepare:

· Review this week’s media presentation, as well as Chapter 1 of the Schuiling and Likis text.

· Select and research one of the following women’s health issues: birth control, abortion, family planning, human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in women, or another issue approved by the course Instructor.

· Consider the impact of political, social, and sociocultural factors on the women’s health issue you selected.

· Reflect on how the personal perceptions of providers might influence their ability or willingness to care for women in relation to this issue. NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment

By Day 3

Post an explanation of the women’s health issue you selected, including the impact of political, social, and sociocultural factors on this issue. Explain how personal perceptions of providers might influence their ability or willingness to care for women in relation to this issue.

Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses.

By Day 6

Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days who selected different issues than you did. Based on your personal and/or professional experiences, expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional insights or contrasting perspectives

Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit!   NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment

Discussion: Political, Social, and Sociocultural Influences on Women’s Health

As an advanced practice nurse, you must remain current on health issues that commonly impact women such as birth control, abortion, family planning, the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Many of these women’s health issues are heavily influenced by political, social, and sociocultural factors. These influences might not only affect a woman’s ability or desire to receive care, but also a provider’s ability or willingness to offer care. How might political, social, and sociocultural factors influence your personal perceptions of these women’s health issues? NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment

To prepare:

· Review this week’s media presentation, as well as Chapter 1 of the Schuiling and Likis text.

· Select and research one of the following women’s health issues: birth control, abortion, family planning, human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in women, or another issue approved by the course Instructor.

· Consider the impact of political, social, and sociocultural factors on the women’s health issue you selected.

· Reflect on how the personal perceptions of providers might influence their ability or willingness to care for women in relation to this issue. NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment

By Day 3

Post an explanation of the women’s health issue you selected, including the impact of political, social, and sociocultural factors on this issue. Explain how personal perceptions of providers might influence their ability or willingness to care for women in relation to this issue.

Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses.

By Day 6

Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days who selected different issues than you did. Based on your personal and/or professional experiences, expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional insights or contrasting perspectives. NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment

Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit!

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
ContentName: NURS_6551_Week1_Discussion_Rubric

Grid View List View Outstanding Performance Excellent Performance Competent Performance Proficient Performance Room for Improvement   Main Posting:
Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.           Points:
Points Range:    44 (44%) – 44 (44%)

Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s) is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.   NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment

supported by at least 3 current, credible sources
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    40 (40%) – 43 (43%)

Responds to the discussion question(s)

is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth  supported by at least 3 credible references
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to most of the discussion question(s)

is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.  NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment

50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth supported by at least 3 credible references
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    31 (31%) – 34 (34%)  NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment

Responds to some of the discussion question(s)

one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis  somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

post is cited with  fewer than 2 credible references
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    0 (0%) – 30 (30%)

Does not respond to the discussion question(s)

lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria

lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis

does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

contains only 1 or no credible references
   Feedback:     Main Posting:
Writing           Points:
Points Range:    6 (6%) – 6 (6%)  NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment

Written clearly and concisely

Contains no grammatical or spelling errors

Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)

Written clearly and concisely

May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Written concisely

May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)  NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment

Written somewhat concisely

May contain more than  two spelling or grammatical errors

Contains some APA formatting errors
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    0 (0%) – 4 (4%)

Not written clearly or concisely

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style
   Feedback:     Main Posting:
Timely and full participation           Points:
Points Range:    10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

Meets requirements for timely and full participation

posts main discussion by due date
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    0 (0%) – 0 (0%)  NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment

NA
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

NA
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

NA
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirement for full participation
   Feedback:     First Response:

Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.           Points:
Points Range:    9 (9%) – 9 (9%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

responds to questions posed by faculty

the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)  NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)

Response is on topic, may have some depth
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Response may not be on topic, lacks depth
   Feedback:     First Response:
Writing           Points:
Points Range:    6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are answered if posed

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed

Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources

Response is written in Standard Edited English
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)  NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication

Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed

Few or no credible sources are cited
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    0 (0%) – 4 (4%)

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective

Response to faculty questions are missing

No credible sources are cited
   Feedback:     First Response:
Timely and full participation           Points:
Points Range:    5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for timely and full participation

posts  by due date
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

NA
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    0 (0%) – 0 (0%)  NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment

NA
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

NA
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirement for full participation
   Feedback:     Second Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.           Points:
Points Range:    9 (9%) – 9 (9%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty

the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)  NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)

Response is on topic, may have some depth
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Response may not be on topic, lacks depth
   Feedback:     Second Response:
Writing           Points:
Points Range:    6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are answered if posed

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    5 (5%) – 5 (5%)  NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed

Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources

Response is written in Standard Edited English
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication

Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed

Few or no credible sources are cited
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    0 (0%) – 4 (4%)

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective

Response to faculty questions are missing

No credible sources are cited
   Feedback:     Second Response:
Timely and full participation           Points:
Points Range:    5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for timely and full participation

Posts  by due date
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    0 (0%) – 0 (0%)  NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment

NA
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

NA
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

NA
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirement for full participation
   Feedback:   
Show DescriptionsShow Feedback
Main Posting:
Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.–Levels of Achievement:Outstanding Performance44 (44%) – 44 (44%)
Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s)

is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

supported by at least 3 current, credible sources
Excellent Performance40 (40%) – 43 (43%) NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment
Responds to the discussion question(s)

is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth

supported by at least 3 credible references
Competent Performance35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to most of the discussion question(s)

is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth

supported by at least 3 credible references
Proficient Performance31 (31%) – 34 (34%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s)

one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed

is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis

somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

post is cited with  fewer than 2 credible references
Room for Improvement0 (0%) – 30 (30%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s)

lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria

lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis

does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

contains only 1 or no credible referencesFeedback: NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment

Main Posting:
Writing–Levels of Achievement:Outstanding Performance6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Written clearly and concisely

Contains no grammatical or spelling errors

Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Excellent Performance5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%) NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment
Written clearly and concisely

May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Competent Performance5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Written concisely

May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Proficient Performance4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)
Written somewhat concisely

May contain more than  two spelling or grammatical errors

Contains some APA formatting errors
Room for Improvement0 (0%) – 4 (4%) NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment
Not written clearly or concisely

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and styleFeedback:

Main Posting:
Timely and full participation–Levels of Achievement:Outstanding Performance10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Meets requirements for timely and full participation

posts main discussion by due date
Excellent Performance0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Competent Performance0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Proficient Performance0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Room for Improvement0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirement for full participationFeedback:

First Response:

Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.–Levels of Achievement:Outstanding Performance9 (9%) – 9 (9%) NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

responds to questions posed by faculty

the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives
Excellent Performance8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings
Competent Performance7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting
Proficient Performance6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on topic, may have some depth
Room for Improvement0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Response may not be on topic, lacks depthFeedback: NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment

First Response:
Writing–Levels of Achievement:Outstanding Performance6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English
Excellent Performance5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are answered if posed

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English
Competent Performance5 (5%) – 5 (5%) NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed

Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources

Response is written in Standard Edited English
Proficient Performance4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication

Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed

Few or no credible sources are cited
Room for Improvement0 (0%) – 4 (4%) NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective

Response to faculty questions are missing

No credible sources are citedFeedback:

First Response:
Timely and full participation–Levels of Achievement:Outstanding Performance5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for timely and full participation

posts  by due date
Excellent Performance0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Competent Performance0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Proficient Performance0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Room for Improvement0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment
Does not meet requirement for full participationFeedback:

Second Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.–Levels of Achievement:Outstanding Performance9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty

the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives
Excellent Performance8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings
Competent Performance7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting
Proficient Performance6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on topic, may have some depth
Room for Improvement0 (0%) – 6 (6%) NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment
Response may not be on topic, lacks depthFeedback:

Second Response:
Writing–Levels of Achievement:Outstanding Performance6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English
Excellent Performance5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are answered if posed

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English
Competent Performance5 (5%) – 5 (5%) NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed

Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources

Response is written in Standard Edited English
Proficient Performance4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication

Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed

Few or no credible sources are cited
Room for Improvement0 (0%) – 4 (4%) NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective

Response to faculty questions are missing

No credible sources are citedFeedback:

Second Response:
Timely and full participation–Levels of Achievement:Outstanding Performance5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for timely and full participation

Posts  by due date
Excellent Performance0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Competent Performance0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Proficient Performance0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment
NA
Room for Improvement0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirement for full participationFeedback:

Total Points: 100

NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment

 

Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 20% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
How it works
Receive a 100% original paper that will pass Turnitin from a top essay writing service
step 1
Upload your instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Pro service tips
How to get the most out of your experience with My Course Writer
One writer throughout the entire course
If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.
The same paper from different writers
You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."
Copy of sources used by the writer
Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.
Testimonials
See why 10k+ students have chosen us as their sole writing assistance provider
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
Psychology
On point! Appreciate all the hard work!!
Customer 452483, August 16th, 2021
Microbiology
Perfect! Thank you guys for all of your great help! :)
Customer 452483, August 23rd, 2021
Communications
Thank you! It was great :)
Customer 452483, July 26th, 2021
Microbiology
Thank you so much! I appreciate what you do and all of the great help you've given me!
Customer 452483, September 6th, 2021
Introduction to Sociology
Amazing! Thank you so much for your hard work, appreciate it!!
Customer 452483, October 24th, 2021
Nursing
Excellent writing !! Definitely I will use your services again... Thank you.
Customer 452487, August 22nd, 2021
Communications
EXCELLENT JOB!!! VERY PLEASED :)
Customer 452483, July 5th, 2021
English 101
Thank you guys for always being there and helping me always get a 100% on my assignments!
Customer 452483, August 16th, 2021
Education
Thank you for your help
Customer 452555, February 16th, 2022
Communications
You're awesome! Thank you so much!
Customer 452483, July 27th, 2021
Psychology
Thank you for all of your help and hard work, truly appreciate you guys always being there with my hectic schedule. Thank you again!
Customer 452483, September 20th, 2021
Psychology
Thank you so much for all of your hard work & help! It’s perfect! Appreciate it!!
Customer 452483, September 11th, 2021
1159
Customer reviews in total
96%
Current satisfaction rate
2 pages
Average paper length
47%
Customers referred by a friend
OUR GIFT TO YOU
20% OFF your first order
Use a coupon 20OFF and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 20% OFF Order in Chat