NUR 4922 Mod 1 Summative Assessment Policy Essay
NUR 4922 Mod 1 Summative Assessment Policy Essay
You were recently promoted to the position of Director of the Medical Surgical unit at your local hospital. You just finished meeting with a group of Directors who were discussing the Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI) rates. Your unit’s CAUTI rate has not decreased since the implementation of a new policy over a year ago. Financial repercussions of the high CAUTI rate cannot continue. You have been given the task of reviewing the policy and creating a SWOT Analysis, offering recommendations for change.
INSTRUCTIONS
Integrating principles of leadership and management, create a
NUR4922-Module-1-Summative-Assessment-Policy.docx
In the SWOT Analysis, include the following:
- S: Strengths of policy
- Choose strengths/positive aspects of the policy, including regulatory guidelines.
- Support choice of strengths with current literature.
- W: Weaknesses of policy
- Choose weaknesses/concerns of the policy related to regulatory guidelines.
- Include weaknesses/concerns of the policy related to financial guidelines.
- Support choice of weaknesses with current literature.
- O: Opportunities
- Include opportunities for growth or improvement of the policy.
- Include perceived opportunities for financial, legal, ethical, quality and safety.
- Support choice of opportunities with current literature.
- T: Threats
- Include perceived threats to financial, legal, ethical, quality and safety.
- Support choice of threats with current literature.
- Propose clearly stated and concise recommendations for change.
- Include descriptions of necessary actions.
- Use evidence to support your recommendations.
Rasmussen Hospital Policy and Procedure Manual Section: Urinary System Policy #421 Subject: Urethral Catheter Insertion Page 1 of 1 Effective: 1/1/2017 Approval: Joan Café, DNP, CNO Reviewed: Objective: To ensure proper completion of urethral catheter insertion. Responsibility: Registered Nurse Policy: It is the policy of Rasmussen Hospital to ensure that all urethral catheter insertions are completed under sterile technique. Two Registered Nurses are to be present for each insertion, and document according to the procedure outlined in this policy. Procedure: All urethral catheter insertions will be completed following the steps outlined below. 1. All insertions will be completed under sterile technique as outlined in the Lippincott Nursing Manual 2013. This manual/ text is considered the policy for the skill portion of catheter insertions. 2. Two RN staff members will complete each insertion. 3. One RN is to complete the insertion; the second RN is to assist and observe, ensuring that sterile technique is not broken. If the technique is broken, the Registered Nurse it to stop insertion and allow the second nurse to continue the procedure. 4. Once completed, both RNs are to document in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) the client’s response to the procedure and that it was completed under sterile technique. NUR4922CBE Section 1CBE Bachelor of Science in Nursing Capstone (11 Weeks).NUR 4922 Mod 1 Summative Assessment Policy Essay
CBE-2021 Spring Quarter Deliverable 1 Rubric Type Percentage Criteria A. 4. Mastery B-3. Proficiency C-2 Competence F-1 – No Pass 1-0 – Not Submitted Grade for Deliverable 1 100% Type o description 75% Type a description 50% Type o description 25% Type o description Type a description 100% of total grade Criterion 1 0% 100% Strengths are analyzed completely and are proven with current literature. 75% Strengths are analyzed completely and partially proven with current literature. 50% Strengths are analyzed and are somewhat proven with current literature 25% No strengths are listed, or the strengths are not analyzed nor proven with current iterature, Not Submitted 0% of total grade Criterion 2 100% Weaknesses are analyzed completely and are proven with current literature. 75% Weaknesses are analyzed completely and partially proven with current literature 50% Weaknesses are analyzed and are somewhat proven with current literature. Not Submitted 25% No weaknesses are listed, or the strengths are not analyzed nor proven with current literature 0% of total grade Criterion 3 100% 75% Opportunities are analyzed Opportunities are analyzed completely and are proven with completely and partially proven current literature. with current literature. 50% Opportunities are analyzed and are somewhat proven with current literature. Not Submitted 25% No opportunities are listed, or the strengths are not analyzed nor proven with current literature. 0% of total grade Criterion 4 75% 100% Threats are analyzed completely and are proven with current literature. Threats are analyzed completely and partially proven with current literature. 50% Threats are analyzed and are somewhat proven with current literature. Not Submitted No threats are listed, or the strengths are not analyzed nor proven with current iterature. 0% of total grade Criterions 100% Recommendations are fully developed and have strong evidence for support. 75% 50% Recommendations are partially Recommendations are given developed with strong evidence with some evidence for for support support. Not Submitted 25% Recommendations are not given, or are very unclear and offer little to no evidence for support 0% of total grade Criterion 6 25% 09 Not Submitted 100% Communication is professional well-constructed, and succinct and contains comprehensive detail Minimal tono speling and grammar errors that do not detract from the audience’s ability to comprehend the material 75% Communication is professional well-constructed, and succinct and contains an appropriate level of detail. Few spelling and grammar errors that do not detract from the audience’s ability to comprehend the material 50% Communication is professional but not well-constructed or succinct and lacks clarity due to missing details. Some spelling and grammar errors, which occasionaly detract from the audience’s ability to comprehend the material. Communication is not professional, well-constructed or succinct and lacks clarity. Numerous spelling and grammar errors, which detract from the audience’s ability to comprehend the material. 0% of total grade Criterion 7 Type o description 100% Sources used are credible, support the purpose of the assignment, and contain Insignificant to no APA crrors. 75% Sources used are credible, but a few don’t support the purpose of the assignment with minimal APA errors. 50% Some sources used are not credible and do not support the purpose of the assignment with some APA errors evident throughout The majority of sources used are not credible and do not support the purpose of the assignment with numerous APA errors throughout 0% of total grade NUR 4922 Mod 1 Summative Assessment Policy Essay
