NRP/513 Version 2 Overall Critique of a Quantitative Research

NRP/513 Version 2 Overall Critique of a Quantitative Research

NRP/513 Version 2 Overall Critique of a Quantitative Research

Aspect of the Report

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
NRP/513 Version 2 Overall Critique of a Quantitative Research
From $10/Page
Order Essay

Critiquing Questions


Is the title a good one, succinctly suggesting key variables and the study population?


Did the abstract clearly and concisely summarize the main features of the report (problem, methods, results, conclusions)?


Statement of the problem

Was the problem stated unambiguously, and was it easy to identify?

Is the problem significant for nursing?

Did the problem statement build a persuasive argument for the new study?

Was there a good match between the research problem and the methods used—that is, was a quantitative approach appropriate?

Hypotheses or research questions

Were research questions and/or hypotheses explicitly stated? If not, was their absence justified?

Were questions and hypotheses appropriately worded, with clear specification of key variables and the study population?

Were the questions/hypotheses consistent with existing knowledge?

Literature review

Was the literature review up-to-date and based mainly on primary sources?

Did the review provide a state-of-the-art synthesis of evidence on the research problem?

Did the literature review provide a strong basis for the new study?

Conceptual/theoretical framework

Were key concepts adequately defined conceptually?

Was a conceptual/theoretical framework articulated—and, if so, was it appropriate? If not, is the absence of a framework justified?

Were the questions/hypotheses consistent with the framework?


Protection of participants’ rights

Were appropriate procedures used to safeguard the rights of study participants?

Was the study subject to external review by an IRB or ethics review board?

Was the study designed to minimize risks and maximize benefits to participants?

Research design

Was the most rigorous design used, given the study purpose?

Were appropriate comparisons made to enhance interpretability of the findings?

Was the number of data collection points appropriate?

Did the design minimize biases and threats to the internal, construct, and external validity of the study (e.g., was blinding used, was attrition minimized)?

Population and sample NRP/513 Version 2 Overall Critique of a Quantitative Research

Was the population identified? Was the sample described in sufficient detail?

Was the best possible sampling design used to enhance the sample’s representativeness? Were sampling biases minimized?

Was the sample size adequate? Was the sample size based on a power analysis?

Data collection and measurement

Were the operational and conceptual definitions congruent?

Were key variables measured using an appropriate method (e.g., interviews, observations, and so on)?

Were the specific instruments adequately described and were they good choices, given the study population and the variables being studied?

Did the report provide evidence that the data collection methods yielded data that were reliable, valid, and responsive?


If there was an intervention, was it adequately described, and was it rigorously developed and implemented? Did most participants allocated to the intervention group actually receive it? Was there evidence of intervention fidelity?

Were data collected in a manner that minimized bias? Were the staff who collected data appropriately trained?


Data analysis

Were analyses undertaken to address each research question or test each hypothesis?

Were appropriate statistical methods used, given the level of measurement of the variables, number of groups being compared, and assumptions of the tests?

Was the most powerful analytic method used? (e.g., did the analysis help to control for confounding variables)?

Were Type I and Type II errors avoided or minimized?

In intervention studies, was an intention-to-treat analysis performed?

Were problems of missing values evaluated and adequately addressed?


Was information about statistical significance presented? Was information about effect size and precision of estimates (confidence intervals) presented?

Were the findings adequately summarized, with good use of tables and figures?

Were findings reported in a manner that facilitates a meta-analysis, and with sufficient information needed for EBP?


Interpretation of the findings

Were all major findings interpreted and discussed within the context of prior research and/or the study’s conceptual framework?

Were causal inferences, if any, justified?

Was the issue of clinical significance discussed?

Were interpretations well-founded and consistent with the study’s limitations?

Did the report address the issue of the generalizability of the findings?


Did the researchers discuss the implications of the study for clinical practice or further research—and were those implications reasonable and complete?

General Issues NRP/513 Version 2 Overall Critique of a Quantitative Research


Was the report well-written, organized, and sufficiently detailed for critical analysis?

In intervention studies, was a CONSORT flowchart provided to show the flow of participants in the study?

Was the report written in a manner that makes the findings accessible to practicing nurses?

Researcher credibility

Do the researchers’ clinical, substantive, or methodologic qualifications and experience enhance confidence in the findings and their interpretation?

Summary assessment

The following questions address statistical conclusion validity, internal validity, construct validity, and external validity. These questions come from Box 10-1 in chapter 10.

1. Was there adequate statistical power? Did the manner in which the independent variable was operationalized create strong contrasts that enhanced statistical power? Was precision enhanced by controlling confounding variables? If hypotheses were not supported (e.g., a hypothesized relationship was not found), is it possible that statistical conclusion validity was compromised?

2. In intervention studies, did the researchers attend to intervention fidelity? For example, were staff adequately trained? Was the implementation of the intervention monitored? Was attention paid to both the delivery and receipt of the intervention?

3. What evidence does the report provide that selection biases were eliminated or minimized? What steps were taken to control confounding participant characteristics that could affect the equivalence of groups being compared? Were these steps adequate?

4. To what extent did the study design rule out the plausibility of other threats to internal validity, such as history, attrition, maturation, and so on? What are your overall conclusions about the internal validity of the study?

5. Were there any major threats to the construct validity of the study? In intervention studies, was there a good match between the underlying conceptualization of the intervention and its operationalization? Was the intervention “pure” or was it confounded with extraneous content, such as researcher expectations? Was the setting or site a good exemplar of the type of setting envisioned in the conceptualization?

6. Was the context of the study sufficiently described to enhance its capacity for external validity? Were the settings or participants representative of the types to which results were designed to be generalized?

7. Overall, did the researcher appropriately balance validity concerns? Was attention paid to certain types of threats (e.g., internal validity) at the expense of others (e.g., external validity)?


Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
*Price with a welcome 20% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
How it works
Receive a 100% original paper that will pass Turnitin from a top essay writing service
step 1
Upload your instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Pro service tips
How to get the most out of your experience with My Course Writer
One writer throughout the entire course
If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.
The same paper from different writers
You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."
Copy of sources used by the writer
Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.
See why 10k+ students have chosen us as their sole writing assistance provider
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
Very clear, and complete information presented. I, thank you for all of your hard work, appreciate it!
Customer 452483, August 9th, 2021
Group Dynamics
Great job. I appreciate it.
Customer 452521, November 22nd, 2021
PERFECT! Thanks a million, you're all awesome!!!!
Customer 452483, July 7th, 2021
English 101
Perfect! Very informative! Appreciate all of your hard work! Thank you very much.
Customer 452483, September 22nd, 2021
Thank you so much for all of your hard work & help! It’s perfect! Appreciate it!!
Customer 452483, September 11th, 2021
thank you
Customer 452639, January 24th, 2023
English 101
Perfect! Thank you so much for all of your hard work and help! Appreciate it!!
Customer 452483, August 30th, 2021
Business and administrative studies
Great produce and on time!
Customer 452561, November 8th, 2022
Good job!! Thank you!!!
Customer 452487, September 9th, 2021
Good job! Thank you.
Customer 452487, October 26th, 2021
You're awesome! Thank you so much!
Customer 452483, July 27th, 2021
Customer 452483, July 5th, 2021
Customer reviews in total
Current satisfaction rate
2 pages
Average paper length
Customers referred by a friend
20% OFF your first order
Use a coupon 20OFF and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 20% OFF Order in Chat