LC4004A Quality Improvement Tools Assessment

LC4004A Quality Improvement Tools Assessment

LC4004A Quality Improvement Tools Assessment

LC4004A Assessment Instructions

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
LC4004A Quality Improvement Tools Assessment
From $10/Page
Order Essay

Review the details of your assessment including the rubric. You will have the ability to submit the assessment once you submit your required self-assessments and engage with your Faculty Subject Matter Expert (SME) in a substantive way about the competency.

Overview

In this Assessment, you will analyze different quality improvement tools and apply one to the practice problem that you identified in LC4002A and either revised or affirmed in LC4003A.

Submission Length: 4- to 5-pages

Looking Ahead

Over the course of Competencies LC4002A – LC4005A, you will be going through the steps of your Quality Improvement Project which will be submitted in LC4005A. During each Competency, you will complete one or more parts of the final project, and in LC4005A, you will use these parts to create the final project.

This practice experience project has six parts:

  1. Analyze available evidence and identify a quality improvement practice problem;
  2. Conduct a literature search finding data and evidence-based solutions/interventions to support the importance of the quality improvement practice problem;
  3. Identify the quality improvement tools (Fishbone diagram, Pareto Chart, Process Flow Chart, etc.) that will display the data supporting the need for the Quality Improvement Project;
  4. Apply the PDSA process to the development of the Quality Improvement Project;
  5. Develop an evidence-based plan to address the quality improvement practice problem; and
  6. Present the final Quality Improvement Project as a comprehensive paper and quality improvement storyboard.

The practice experience is an active learning process that provides you with the opportunity to apply your nursing knowledge by addressing a quality improvement practice problem. The practice experience is comprised of selected onsite experiences and completion of a Quality Improvement Project with guidance from your subject matter expert. For additional information on the practice experience, follow this link: 

The practice experience guide can also be found here: 

Instructions

To complete this Assessment, do the following:

  • Be sure to adhere to the indicated assignment length.
  • Access the following:

Before submitting your Assessment, carefully review the rubric. This is the same rubric the SME will use to evaluate your submission and it provides detailed criteria describing how to achieve or master the Competency. Many students find that understanding the requirements of the Assessment and the rubric criteria help them direct their focus and use their time most productively.

Rubric

All submissions must follow the conventions of scholarly writing. Properly formatted APA citations and references must be provided where appropriate. Submissions that do not meet these expectations will be returned without scoring.

This Assessment requires submission of one file that addresses each of the given prompts. Save your file as LC4004A_firstinitial_lastname (for example, LC4004A_J_Smith).

You may submit a draft of your assignment to the  area to check for authenticity. When you are ready to upload your completed Assessment, use the Assessment tab on the top navigation menu.

Important Note: As a student taking this Competency, you agree that you may be required to submit your Assessment for textual similarity review to Turnitin.com for the detection of plagiarism. All submitted Assessment materials will be included as source documents in the Turnitin.com reference database solely for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of such materials. Use of the Turnitin.com service is subject to the Usage Policy posted on the Turnitin.com site.

Applying Quality Improvement Tools

The nursing professional uses a variety of tools when collecting and analyzing data. These tools can help with organizing and displaying as well as highlighting trends. In this Assessment, you will analyze several quality improvement tools, then apply one to your practice problem.

In a 4- to 5-page paper, address the following:

  • Analyze the fishbone diagram. Explain how the information presented in the fishbone diagram might be used to help inform nursing practice when preventing medication errors.
  • Analyze the Pareto chart. Include an explanation of how many medication errors there were and how this information might assist the nursing unit in preventing future medication errors.
  • Analyze the process flow chart. Explain how this information might be used to help inform nursing practice for the prevention of future medication errors.
  • Analyze the run chart as it relates to patient satisfaction with pain management. Explain whether the data in the run chart indicates improved or decreased satisfaction with pain management and defend your reasoning.
  • Consider the practice problem that you identified in LC4002 and either revised or affirmed in LC4003. Choose either a fishbone diagram, Pareto chart, process flow chart, or run chart, and apply it to the data relating to the practice problem (that you located in LC4002).

Resources – LC4004A Quality Improvement Tools Assessment

Chapter 6, “Performance Improvement Tools” (pp. 148–149) Spath, P. (2018). Introduction to healthcare quality management (3rd ed.). Healthcare Administration Press.

Chapter 4, “Evaluating Performance” (pp. 91–92) Spath, P. (2018). Introduction to healthcare quality management (3rd ed.). Healthcare Administration Press.

Minnesota Department of Health. (n.d.). Pareto chart. https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/practice/resources/phqitoolbox/pareto.html

IHI Open School. (2015, March 3). Whiteboard: Pareto analysis. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbDRH2ASyqQ

American Society for Quality. (2015). What is a Pareto chart. http://asq.org/learn-about-quality/cause-analysis-tools/overview/pareto.html

Chapter 23, “Managing Quality and Risk’ (p. 417) Yoder-Wise, P. (2019). Leading and managing in nursing (7th ed.). Mosby Elsevier.

Process Mapping: A Cornerstone of Quality Improvement Heher, Y. K., & Chen, Y. (2017). Process mapping: A cornerstone of quality improvement. Cancer Cytopathology. 125(12), 887–890. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncy.21946

American Society for Quality. (2016b). What is a process flow chart? http://asq.org/learn-about-quality/process-analysis-tools/overview/flowchart.html

Chapter 4, “Evaluating Performance” (pp. 79–83) Spath, P. (2018). Introduction to healthcare quality management (3rd ed.). Healthcare Administration Press.

LC4004A: Quality Improvement Tools: Analyze information from quality improvement tools. Assessment Rubric

Rubric Criteria Does Not Meet Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations
Module 1: Fishbone Diagram
Analyze the fishbone diagram.

 

Learning Objective 1.1: Analyze fishbone diagrams

Response does not adequately analyze the fishbone diagram. Response adequately analyzes the fishbone diagram. Response clearly and completely analyzes the fishbone diagram.
Explain how the information presented in the fishbone diagram might be used to help inform nursing practice when preventing medication errors.

 

Learning Objective 1.2: Analyze the use of fishbone diagrams in preventing medication

errors

Response does not adequately explain how the information presented in the fishbone diagram might be used to help inform nursing practice when preventing medication errors. Response adequately explains how the information presented in the fishbone diagram might be used to help inform nursing practice when preventing medication errors. Response clearly and completely explains how the information presented in the fishbone diagram might be used to help inform nursing practice when preventing medication errors.
Module 2: Pareto Chart
Analyze the Pareto chart.

 

Learning Objective 2.1: Analyze Pareto charts

Response does not adequately analyze the Pareto chart. Response adequately analyzes the Pareto chart. Response clearly and completely analyzes the Pareto chart.

  

Rubric Criteria Does Not Meet Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations
Include an explanation of how many medication errors there were and how this information might assist the nursing unit in preventing future medication errors.

 

Learning Objective 2.2: Explain medication error prevention information based on a Pareto chart

Response does not adequately explain how many medication errors there were or how this information might assist the nursing unit in preventing future medication errors. Response adequately explains how many medication errors there were and adequately explains how this information might assist the nursing unit in preventing future medication errors. Response clearly and completely explain how many medication errors there were and thoroughly explains how this information might assist the nursing unit in preventing future medication errors.
Module 3: Process Flow Chart
Analyze the process flow chart.

 

Learning Objective 3.1: Analyze process flow charts

Response does not adequately analyze the process flow chart. Response adequately analyzes the process flow chart. Response clearly and completely analyzes the process flow chart.
Explain how this information might be used to help inform nursing practice for the prevention of future medication errors.

 

Learning Objective 3.2: Explain the use of process

flow charts in preventing medication errors

Response does not adequately explain how the process flow chart information might be used to help inform nursing practice for the prevention of future medication errors. Response adequately explains how the process flow chart information might be used to help inform nursing practice for the prevention of future medication errors. Response clearly and completely explains how the process flow chart information might be used to help inform nursing practice for the prevention of future medication errors.
Module 4: Run Chart
Analyze the run chart as it relates to patient Response does not adequately analyze the run Response adequately analyzes the run chart as it. LC4004A Quality Improvement Tools Assessment Response clearly and completely analyzes the

 

Rubric Criteria Does Not Meet Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations
satisfaction with pain management.

 

Learning Objective 4.1: Analyze run charts

chart as it relates to patient satisfaction with pain management. relates to patient satisfaction with pain management. run chart as it relates to patient satisfaction with pain management.
Explain whether the data in the run chart indicates improved or decreased satisfaction with pain management.

 

Learning Objective 4.2: Explain run chart data

Response does not adequately explain whether the data in the run chart indicates improved or decreased satisfaction with pain management. Response adequately explains whether the data in the run chart indicates improved or decreased satisfaction with pain management. Response clearly and completely explains whether the data in the run chart indicates improved or decreased satisfaction with pain management.
Defend your reasoning for whether the run chart indicates improved or decreased satisfaction with pain management.

 

Learning Objective 4.3: Defend your assessment of run chart data

Response does not adequately defend your reasoning for whether the run chart indicates improved or decreased satisfaction with pain management. Response adequately defends your reasoning for whether the run chart indicates improved or decreased satisfaction with pain management. Response clearly and completely defends your reasoning for whether the run chart indicates improved or decreased satisfaction with pain management.
Choose either a fishbone diagram, Pareto chart, process flow chart, or run chart, and apply it to the data relating to the practice problem. Response does not adequately select or apply a quality improvement tool to the data relating to the practice problem. LC4004A Quality Improvement Tools Assessment Response adequately selects and applies a quality improvement tool to the data relating to the practice problem. Response clearly and completely selects and applies a quality improvement tool to the data relating to the practice problem.

 

Rubric Criteria Does Not Meet Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations
Learning Objective 4.4: Apply quality improvement tools to nursing practice problems

 

Professional Skills Assessment

 

Professional Writing
Professional Writing: Clarity, Flow, and Organization Content contains significant spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors.

Writing does not demonstrate adequate sentence and paragraph structure and requires additional editing/proofreading. Key sections of presented content lack clarity, logical flow, and/or organization.

Content contains few spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates adequate sentence and paragraph structure and may require some editing. Content presented is satisfactorily clear, logical, and/or organized, but could

benefit from additional editing/revision.

Content is free from spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors.

Writing demonstrates appropriate sentence and paragraph structure.

Content presented is clear, logical, and well-organized.

Professional Writing: Context, Audience, Purpose, and Tone Content minimally or does not demonstrate awareness of context, audience, and/or purpose. Writing is not reflective of professional/scholarly tone and/or is not free of bias.

Style is inconsistent with the professional setting/workplace context

Content demonstrates satisfactory awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is adequately professional, scholarly, and/or free from bias, and style is mostly consistent with the

professional setting/workplace context. LC4004A Quality Improvement Tools Assessment

Content clearly demonstrates awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is highly professional, scholarly, and free from bias, and style is appropriate for the professional setting/workplace context.

 

and reflects the need for additional editing.
Professional Writing: Content does not Content adequately reflects Content reflects original
Originality, Source adequately reflect original original writing and thought and writing and
Credibility, and Attribution writing and/or paraphrasing. paraphrasing. Writing proper paraphrasing.
of Ideas Writing demonstrates demonstrates adequate Writing demonstrates full
inconsistent adherence to adherence to reference adherence to reference
reference requirements, requirements, including the requirements, including the
including the use of credible use of credible evidence to use of credible evidence to
evidence to support a claim, support a claim, with support a claim, with
with appropriate source appropriate source appropriate source
attribution (when applicable) attribution (when attribution (when applicable)
and reference. There are applicable) and references. and references.
numerous and/or significant There are one or two minor
errors. errors.

LC4004A Quality Improvement Tools Assessment

 

Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 20% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
How it works
Receive a 100% original paper that will pass Turnitin from a top essay writing service
step 1
Upload your instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Pro service tips
How to get the most out of your experience with My Course Writer
One writer throughout the entire course
If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.
The same paper from different writers
You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."
Copy of sources used by the writer
Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.
Testimonials
See why 10k+ students have chosen us as their sole writing assistance provider
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
Education
Thank you for your help
Customer 452555, February 16th, 2022
Healthcare Writing & Communications
Thank you so much for all of your hard work! Appreciate it all!
Customer 452483, November 14th, 2021
English 101
This writer was very quick with the draft and even faster with the revision! Thank you!
Customer 452603, May 30th, 2022
Sociology
Thank you so much! Appreciate it!
Customer 452483, November 8th, 2021
Communications
Thank you! It was great :)
Customer 452483, July 26th, 2021
Communications
Thank you so much!
Customer 452461, June 23rd, 2021
Psychology
On point! Appreciate all the hard work!!
Customer 452483, August 16th, 2021
Psychology
Very clear, and complete information presented. I, thank you for all of your hard work, appreciate it!
Customer 452483, August 9th, 2021
Microbiology
Thank you so much! I appreciate what you do and all of the great help you've given me!
Customer 452483, September 6th, 2021
Group Dynamics
Great job. I appreciate it.
Customer 452521, November 22nd, 2021
Introduction to Sociology
Thank you very much for all of your hard work!
Customer 452483, October 15th, 2021
Nursing
Excellent job! super recommended.
Customer 452487, August 24th, 2021
1159
Customer reviews in total
96%
Current satisfaction rate
2 pages
Average paper length
47%
Customers referred by a friend
OUR GIFT TO YOU
20% OFF your first order
Use a coupon 20OFF and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 20% OFF Order in Chat