Health education needs of incarcerated women Discussion
Health education needs of incarcerated women Discussion
| Week 4 Template | Quantitative Article | Qualitative Article |
| Identify and describe the sample including demographics, in the studies chosen in W2 Assignment 2 | The researchers used a purposive, non-probability sample. The study demographics are incarcerated women from all ethnic backgrounds and all age groups. | A convenience sample was used. 312 study participants were chosen for the sample. The study demographics characteristics are (1) age between 19 and 84; (3) various social backgrounds; (4) females were the prevailing gender group; (5) more than 60% of subjects had an academic degree; (6) more than 70% of all participants agreed to donate their organs. |
| Discuss the steps of the data collection process used in the studies | To collect the research data, the subjects were divided into two groups depending on the type of blocks they were kept in. The interviewer visited both groups. Provisions were made to keep the correctional officers at a distance from the interview rooms in order to minimize the threat of acquiring the biased research results. | Online survey helped in collecting research data.
Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Health education needs of incarcerated women Discussion
From $10/Page
|
| Identify the study variables (independent and dependent) | Independent variables are trust, respect, and empowerment, and dependent variable is the quality of health education offered to incarcerated women. | Independent variables are spiritual health, purpose in life, and social-demographic status, and dependent variable is the decision to sign the donor card. |
| Identify the sampling design | “A non-random purposive sample” (Dinkel & Schmidt, 2015, p. 27).
|
A random choice of focus groups |
| Describe the instrument, tool, or survey used in each article. | The instrument is a questionnaire, the tool is interview | Researchers used online survey. |
| Summarize the discussion about the validity and reliability of the instruments, tools, or surveys used in each article | Since the purposeful sample was selected for the research, the scholars evaluated the external validity of their research results as rather high (Dinkel & Schmidt, 2015).
|
The scholars stated that they are aware of the strong and weak points of the instrument selected for the research. They considered the privacy provided by the online survey tool the strong characteristic of their research project (Bortz, Ashkenazi, & Melnikov, 2015). They believed this peculiarity enabled the study subjects to provide unbiased answers. The limitations they noted were connected to the religious and ethnic homogeneity of study subjects. They explained that because the study was conducted in Israel, most respondents were the Hebrew followers of Judaism (Bortz et al., 2015). |
| Identify the legal and ethical concerns for each article, including informed consent and IRB approval | IRB approved the research proposal. Before interviewing participants, researchers made the provisions to obtain their informed consent. | IRB approved the research procedures. The informed consent form was placed at the top of the online questionnaire, so subjects could proceed to answering questions only after signing in the informed consent. |
Conclusion: Analysis of research components of the proposed articles demonstrated the high validity and credibility of the research results. However, as in any study, the researchers faced certain limitations, so they made notifications regarding the possibility of minor drawbacks.
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.
Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.
Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.
The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument
