DNP 838 SWOT Analysis of a Nurse Residency Program Discussion
DNP 838 SWOT Analysis of a Nurse Residency Program Discussion
Conduct a SWOT analysis of an existing program with which you are familiar. This could be a program in your current setting, a program you have taught in as a faculty member, or a program you have taken as a learner. Use the SWOT analysis to determine opportunities for program evaluation and revision. Consider how you can bolster strengths and eliminate weaknesses. In 250-500 words, identify the key findings of your SWOT analysis.
In addition to conducting the SWOT analysis, design a concept map to show your next steps for program design. Your concept map should also include the resources, stakeholders, and relationships of the program’s outcomes to the program’s delivery, setting, and community. Identify strategies for continuous quality improvement, with attention to professional and regulatory agency benchmarking for program performance.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
Course Code DNP-838 Class Code DNP-838-O500 Criteria Program SWOT Analysis and Concept Map Percentage 100.0% Key Findings of SWOT Analysis 25.0% Resources, Stakeholders, and Relationships of the Outcomes of the Program to the Delivery, Setting, and Community of the Program 25.0% Strategies for Continuous Quality Improvement, With Attention to Professional and Regulatory Agency Benchmarking for Program Performance 25.0% Research 5.0% Concepts 5.0% Presentation 5.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 5.0% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Total Weightage 100% Assignment Title Program SWOT Analysis and Concept Map Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Key findings of SWOT analysis are not included. Resources, stakeholders, and relationships of the outcomes of the program to the delivery, setting, and community of the program are not included. Strategies for continuous quality improvement, with attention to professional and regulatory agency benchmarking for program performance, are not included. No outside sources are used to support the assignment. Main concept is not clearly identified, and subconcepts do not consistently branch from the main idea. The piece is not neat or organized, and it does not include all required elements. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed. Sources are not documented.DNP 838 SWOT Analysis of a Nurse Residency Program Discussion
Total Points 65.0 Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) Key findings of SWOT analysis are present, but they lack detail or are incomplete. Resources, stakeholders, and relationships of the outcomes of the program to the delivery, setting, and community of the program are present, but they lack detail or are incomplete. Strategies for continuous quality improvement, with attention to professional and regulatory agency benchmarking for program performance are present, but they lack detail or are incomplete. Few outside sources are used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent. Main concept is not clearly identified, and few subconcepts branch appropriately. Limited understanding of assignment is apparent. The work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of required elements. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Satisfactory (79.00%) Key findings of SWOT analysis are present. Resources, stakeholders, and relationships of the outcomes of the program to the delivery, setting, and community of the program are present. Resources, stakeholders, and relationships of the outcomes of the program to the delivery, setting, and community of the program are present. Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, or timeliness. Main concept is easily identified, and few subconcepts branch from the main idea. Only a basic understanding of assignment is present. The overall appearance is generally neat, but major elements are missing. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Good (87.00%) Key findings of SWOT analysis are clearly provided and well developed. Resources, stakeholders, and relationships of the outcomes of the program to the delivery, setting, and community of the program are clearly provided and well developed. Resources, stakeholders, and relationships of the outcomes of the program to the delivery, setting, and community of the program are clearly provided and well developed. Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. Main concept is easily identified and most subconcepts branch from the main idea. An original and creative concept fulfills the parameters of assignment. The overall appearance is neat, with only a few minor flaws or missing elements. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. DNP 838 SWOT Analysis of a Nurse Residency Program Discussion
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Excellent (100.00%) Key findings of SWOT analysis are thoroughly developed with supporting details. Resources, stakeholders, and relationships of the outcomes of the program to the delivery, setting, and community of the program are thoroughly developed with supporting details. Resources, stakeholders, and relationships of the outcomes of the program to the delivery, setting, and community of the program are thoroughly developed with supporting details. Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive and address all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. Main concept is easily identified, and subconcepts branch appropriately from the main idea. Projects exhibit the process of creative thinking and the development of an individual style. The work is well presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional. Comments The writer is clearly in command of standard,
